Some of Ms. Strickland’s recent representations include:

• Ongoing representation of Zappos.com in a major data security matter
• Foley Motors, Inc. v. BMW et al. – Prevailed on summary judgment in favor of BMW Bank of North America and BMW Financial Services NA, LLC, defeating a putative class action alleging over $40 million in potential damages under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, 47 U.S.C. § 227. The order provides valuable support to defendants’ efforts to defeat claims based on the unauthorized conduct of third parties.
• Sarukhanov v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. – Prevailed on appeal following partial summary judgment on a claim under California’s Identity Theft Act.  On an issue of first impression and of importance to retail banks, the Ninth Circuit held that the Identity Theft Act does not apply to claims involving a deposit account because the defendant bank was not a “claimant” under the Act.
• Lal v. Capital One Financial Corp., et al. – On a motion to dismiss, the court adopted Stroock’s argument on behalf of HSBC restricting statutory damages for pre-2017 violations of California’s call recording statute to per action as opposed to per violation, dramatically reducing the value of the alleged claim.
• Zepeda v. PayPal, Inc. et al. – Prevailed on motion to dismiss in class action brought against PayPal and eBay and thereafter successfully negotiated a nationwide settlement involving over 100 million PayPal account holders in the U.S.  The settlement received final approval in March 2017, after more than four years of contentious litigation with numerous objectors over the settlement terms.
• Triyar Hospitality Management LLC v. WSI (II) – HWP LLC, et al. – Prevailed in obtaining judgment on behalf of WSI in a complex real estate dispute following a one-month trial. The court earlier granted summary judgment for WSI on plaintiff’s fraud and negligent misrepresentation claims.
• Edwards et al. v. Macy’s, Inc. et al. – Successfully defeated putative class claims against Department Stores National Bank and Macy’s Inc. based on preemption under the National Bank Act and OCC regulations.
• In re Zappos.com, Inc. – Obtained an important victory for Zappos.com, Inc. in federal multidistrict litigation, dismissing claims arising from a data security incident.
• Miceli v. Staples, Inc., and Citibank, N.A. – Successfully compelled individual arbitration in a putative class action, ending more than four years of litigation. The California Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District, affirmed the trial court’s decision enforcing Citibank’s arbitration agreement.
• Deniz v. Chase – Defeated class certification on behalf of JPMorgan Chase in action for violations of various California consumer protection laws in connection with the purchase of Retail Installment Sales Contracts from California automobile dealers.
• Lead defense counsel for Citibank, JPMorgan Chase, HSBC, Discover, American Express, Synchrony and BMW Financial Services, among others, in multiple class and individual actions alleging violations of the TCPA and various telephone call recording practices.

• Named to the Los Angeles Business Journal’s list of “Top Litigators and Trial Lawyers” in 2019.
• Recognized by Los Angeles Business Journal as one of the “Most Influential Women Attorneys” in 2018 and 2019.
• Selected by Law360 as a 2017 Banking MVP joining an elite slate of only six lawyers nationally who have distinguished themselves from their peers.
• Nationally recognized as a leading lawyer by Chambers USA: America’s Leading Lawyers for Business for work in Financial Services Regulation: Consumer Finance (Litigation) − Band 1.
• Benchmark Litigation named Ms. Strickland a “Litigation Star” for 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018 and 2019.  The publication identifies the leading trial attorneys and firms at the local and national levels. Benchmark Litigation has also recognized Ms. Strickland as a National “Litigation Star,” top California litigator and one of the “Top 250 Women in Litigation.”
• Named by the Los Angeles Daily Journal as one of California’s “Top Women Lawyers” 14 times, including most recently in 2019.
• Los Angeles Business Journal honored Ms. Strickland in their Leader in Law awards, naming her one of their “Lawyers of the Year” for 2016 and 2017.
• Ranked by Super Lawyers since 2004, including as one of “The Top LA Women Lawyers” from 2012-2015 and for outstanding work in Banking Law for 2013-2017.
• Named by the Los Angeles Times as one of “Southern California’s Best Lawyers” since 2012.
• Recognized by leading corporate counsel as a member of the BTI Consulting Group’s “2011 Client Services All-Stars.”
• Annually recognized by The Best Lawyers in America in the category of “Litigation – Banking & Finance” from 2010-2019.

• Board Member, Abraham.In.Motion
• Board of Directors, Center Dance Arts
• Co-Chair, Board of Ambassadors, Los Angeles Music Center
• Board of Directors, American Dance Movement

Ms. Strickland frequently speaks on the topics of complex litigation and financial services. From 1997 through 2018, Ms. Strickland has co-chaired the Annual Consumer Financial Services Institute for the Practising Law Institute. She also regularly speaks at PLI’s Class Action Litigation Institute. Ms. Strickland also has been a Guest Lecturer at UCLA Law School on the topic, “Negotiating and Drafting a Class Action Settlement Agreement.” She regularly speaks to professional and trade groups, as well as to government bodies.

Additional recent presentations include:

• Moderator, “Tales from the Frontline: Sharing Stories on Success, Failures and What Keeps Them Up at Night,” Women Leaders in Financial Services Law and Compliance, September 18, 2019
• CSUN Professor for a Day; Business Law, October 10, 2017
• Speaker, “Consumer Finance Class Actions and Enforcement,” Cornerstone Research, Los Angeles, CA, November 9, 2016
• Speaker, Recent Changes to the TCPA and Potential Social Media Impact, Bloomberg BNA Webinar, November 12, 2015
• Panelist, 2015 Class Actions National Institute, American Bar Association, October 22-23, 2015
• Speaker, Los Angeles Client Advisory Council Meeting, September 25, 2014

Ms. Strickland has authored a wide range of publications. Most recent selections include:

• “California Supreme Court Limits Scope of Class Action Ascertainability Defense,” Stroock Special Bulletin, July 31, 2019
• “Supreme Court Opens Door to Challenges to FCC’s TCPA Interpretations,” Stroock Special Bulletin, June 20, 2019
• “CFPB Debt Collection Proposed Rule – Threats & Opportunities,” Stroock Special Bulletin, May 14, 2019
• “SCOTUS Limits the Definition of ‘Debt Collector’ Under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act,” Stroock Special Bulletin, March 21, 2019
• “TCPA Update – Predictive Dialer Held Not To Be An ATDS,” Stroock Special Bulletin, July 27, 2018
• “California Enacts Broad-Reaching Consumer Privacy Legislation,” Stroock Special Bulletin, June 28, 2018
• “California Poised to Enact Broad-Reaching Consumer Privacy Legislation,” Stroock Special Bulletin, June 27, 2018
• “Supreme Court Limits American Pipe’s Impact On Putative Class Claims,” Stroock Special Bulletin, June 13, 2018
• “2018 Annual Overview of California’s Unfair Competition Law and Consumers Legal Remedies Act,” Stroock Client Memorandum, March 2018
• “DC Circuit Issues Long-Awaited Opinion Addressing Challenges To FCC’s 2015 TCPA Ruling,” Stroock Special Bulletin, March 16, 2018
• “Preemption Battles & Class Actions Ahead?” Stroock Special Bulletin, March 9, 2018
• “Opportunities to Reframe CFPB Enforcement,” Stroock Special Bulletin, February 2, 2018
• “Strategies for Fundamental CFPB Changes,” Stroock Special Bulletin, January 18, 2018
• “Cordray Announces November Departure from CFPB,” Stroock Special Bulletin, November 15, 2017
• “Ninth Circuit Holds That Previously-Deceived Consumer Has Article III Standing To Seek Injunctive Relief,” Stroock Special Bulletin, October 24, 2017
• “Senate Votes to Reject CFPB Arbitration Rule,” Stroock Special Bulletin, October 24, 2017
• “What CFPB’s First No-Action Letter Signals,” Stroock Special Bulletin, September 15, 2017
• “CFPB Watch,” Stroock Special Bulletin, September 5, 2017
• “Ninth Circuit Rules Plaintiff Has Article III Standing In Spokeo, Leaves More Questions Unanswered,” Stroock Special Bulletin, August 15, 2017
• “Second Circuit Holds That Contractually Provided TCPA Consent May Not Be Unilaterally Revoked,” Stroock Special Bulletin, June 23, 2017
• “Affirmed – Defaulted Debt Buyer Not Subject to FDCPA,” Stroock Special Bulletin, June 13, 2017
• “Which Constitutional Question Will Decide PHH v. CFPB?,” Stroock Special Bulletin, May 25, 2017
• “CFPB & States Focus on Small Business Lending,” Stroock Special Bulletin, May 12, 2017
• “Case Will Test Standing of Settlement Objectors,” The Daily Journal, April 17, 2017
• “D.C. Circuit Strikes Down FCC’s Order Requiring Opt-out Language on Solicited Fax Advertisements,” Stroock Special Bulletin, March 31, 2017
• “2017 Annual Overview of California’s Unfair Competition Law and Consumers Legal Remedies Act,” Stroock Client Memorandum, March 2017
• “CFPB in Long-Haul Battle,” Stroock Special Bulletin, February 14, 2017
• “Election Implications for the CFPB,” Stroock Special Bulletin, November 9, 2016
• “D.C. Circuit’s PHH Ruling Reins in CFPB,” Stroock Special Bulletin, October 12, 2016
• “Payment Processing Continued Target of CFPB and Litigation,” Stroock Special Bulletin, August 23, 2016
• “CFPB Proposes Amendments to TRID Rule,” Stroock Special Bulletin, August 1, 2016
• “CFPB Proposes ‘Drastic Overhaul’ of Debt Collection,” Stroock Special Bulletin, July 29, 2016
• “Buckle Up for CFPB Anti-Redlining Drive,” Stroock Special Bulletin, June 30, 2016
• “CFPB Announces Proposed Rule Regulating Payday Lending,” Stroock Special Bulletin, June 3, 2016
• “Supreme Court Rules in Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins: Injury Must Be Particularized and Concrete,” Stroock Special Bulletin, May 16, 2016
• “CFPB Publishes Long-Awaited Proposed Rule Precluding Class-Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements,” Stroock Special Bulletin, May 5, 2016
• “2016 Annual Overview of California’s Unfair Competition Law and Consumers Legal Remedies Act,” Stroock Client Memorandum, March 2016
• “Supreme Court Ruling in Tyson Foods Leaves Many Class Action Questions Unresolved,” Stroock Special Bulletin, March 22, 2016
• “Important National Bank Act Preemption Decision,” Stroock Special Bulletin, March 10, 2016

Quoted in:

• “Wall Street Firms Among Toughest For Female Partners,” Law360, April 20, 2016

California

U.S. District Court, Central District of California; U.S. District Court, Northern District of California; U.S. District Court, Southern District of California; U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California; U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois; U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit; U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit; U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit; U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit; U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit; U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit; California Supreme Court; U.S. Supreme Court

J.D., University of California, Los Angeles, School of Law, 1978

B.A., University of California – San Diego, 1975